🗓️ Mayıs 28, 2025
When launching a crypto token, one of the first decisions you’ll face is choosing the right blockchain. Two of the most prominent standards are Solana’s SPL and Ethereum’s ERC-20.
While both enable token creation, they differ in architecture, speed, cost, and ecosystem compatibility.
Let’s explore the key differences — and help you decide which one fits your project best.
Ethereum ERC-20: Each token is a separate smart contract written in Solidity.
Solana SPL: All tokens use the same Token Program on-chain (no separate contract needed).
Solana is built for scale — using parallel execution (Sealevel) and Proof of History for fast consensus.
Ethereum is slower due to its single-threaded EVM and longer confirmation times.
Fees on Ethereum can spike during network congestion, often costing several dollars per transaction.
Solana offers near-zero fees, making it ideal for microtransactions and high-volume apps.
ERC-20 is supported by nearly all wallets, exchanges, and DeFi protocols.
SPL is supported by Solana-native platforms and growing rapidly.
ERC-20 development is straightforward with Solidity and tools like Hardhat and OpenZeppelin.
SPL tokens are easy to create for standard use, but custom logic requires knowledge of Rust or Anchor.
Solana Token Creator helps you launch SPL tokens in seconds — no code needed, IPFS ready, and wallet-compatible.