🚀 Launch Your Token

📝 ⚖️ Solana SPL Tokens vs Ethereum ERC-20: Key Differences

← Back to Blog

🗓️ Mayıs 28, 2025

⚖️ Solana SPL Tokens vs Ethereum ERC-20: Key Differences

When launching a crypto token, one of the first decisions you’ll face is choosing the right blockchain. Two of the most prominent standards are Solana’s SPL and Ethereum’s ERC-20.
While both enable token creation, they differ in architecture, speed, cost, and ecosystem compatibility.

Let’s explore the key differences — and help you decide which one fits your project best.

 

⚙️ Technical Architecture

Ethereum ERC-20: Each token is a separate smart contract written in Solidity.
Solana SPL: All tokens use the same Token Program on-chain (no separate contract needed).

 

🚀 Speed and Throughput

Solana is built for scale — using parallel execution (Sealevel) and Proof of History for fast consensus.
Ethereum is slower due to its single-threaded EVM and longer confirmation times.

 

💸 Transaction Costs

Fees on Ethereum can spike during network congestion, often costing several dollars per transaction.
Solana offers near-zero fees, making it ideal for microtransactions and high-volume apps.

 

🔗 Ecosystem and Wallet Support

ERC-20 is supported by nearly all wallets, exchanges, and DeFi protocols.
SPL is supported by Solana-native platforms and growing rapidly.

 

🛠️ Developer Experience

ERC-20 development is straightforward with Solidity and tools like Hardhat and OpenZeppelin.
SPL tokens are easy to create for standard use, but custom logic requires knowledge of Rust or Anchor.

 

📊 Best Use Cases

 

🚀 Summary

Solana Token Creator helps you launch SPL tokens in seconds — no code needed, IPFS ready, and wallet-compatible.